Case Study 1: Knowing and responding to your students’ diverse needs


Contextual Background
I teach on the MA Biodesign program at CSM, an interdisciplinary program, with students from design, art and scientific backgrounds. The course is diverse in terms of age, cultural backgrounds and experiences. Some students have learning difficulties and others struggle with language and communication. There are often tensions around collaboration and group work.

Evaluation
We use workshop based session so that all students can engage in some way. For example running sessions with elements of kinaesthetic activities such as prototyping or filmmaking. We also bring in people from diverse backgrounds and skills to run sessions to offer a range of perspectives. Last year we bought in experts from UAL to run a workshop with our then 1st year cohort around intercultural communication and collaboration. Students mentioned this approach worked well but may have come a bit late in the year. This year we ran a similar session with a new larger cohort, but it didn’t go down well causing further tensions around collaboration. 

Moving forwards
ICT Workshop: I found an online session on building Intercultural Communication Skills for staff at UAL I wish to complete and will encourage my colleagues to as well in order to take on a students perspective of learning when English is not the working language for everyone (UAL, 2023).

Diverse references: In my teaching I have started to reference practitioners taking a more diverse approaches to design such as Deepa Butoliya’s Critical Jugaad framework examining making practices from the Global South (Butoliya, 2022).

Digital Tools: In my peer observations I have seen how online tools such as ‘Padlet’ and ‘Miro’ are used In teaching contexts. I have experimented with both as tools to keep students engaged, students already use ‘Miro’ quite a lot as a way to map and communicate ideas (Miro, 2024). ‘Padlet’ was less successful when I tried it, no one made the effort to log on (Padlet, 2024).

The 5 dysfunctions, Image via: https://aboutnsa.weebly.com/blog/the-five-dysfunctions-of-a-team-by-patrick-lencioni

5 dysfunctions of a team: Our difficulties around collaboration and group work could be due to miscommunication, stress, different cultural experiences as well as larger cohorts where students don’t know each other. A colleague mentioned the book the five dysfunctions of a team by Patrick Lencioni as an approach to encourage better team work. The 5 dysfunctions are interesting and I have noticed these in many of my team working situations, from lack of trust and a misalignment of a common goal, but this approach is targeted more for a workplace context (Lencioni, 2007). I did a quick micro-teach explaining the five dysfunctions on the thinking teaching session last year, and will find an effective way to implement and adapt these in a future session with students.

Reflecting on how badly the intercultural communication and collaboration workshop went this year could show us that more awareness needs to be built into our teaching strategy and come from us, rather than externally. Perhaps a lot of miscommunication is due to a lack of studio culture. I will look at more opportunities and touch points where I can introduce ideas around collaboration more in my practise be it through workshop activities or sessions focused on peer learning and exchange.

References:

Butoliya, D. (2022) ‘Critical Jugaad Ontologies: Practices for just future’, DIID, 01. Available at: doi:10.30682/diid7622d. 

Lencioni, P.M. (2007) The five dysfunctions of a team: A leadership fable. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.

Miro (2024) Miro. Available at: https://miro.com/ (Accessed: 15 February 2024).

Padlet (2024) Padlet. Available at: https://padlet.com (Accessed: 15 February 2024).

UAL (2023) ‘Intercultural and Communication Training (ICT) for staff and students‘. Available at: https://canvas.arts.ac.uk/sites/explore/SitePage/45349/intercultural-and-communication-training-ict#visualcommsstudent (Accessed: 15 February 2024).

Posted in TPP Case Studies, TPP Submission | Leave a comment

Record of Observation or Review of Teaching Practice 2 Peer Observation

Jon observing Emma (12/2/24)

Session/artefact to be observed/reviewed: Teaching session

Size of student group: Class size is 36, attendance is variable, anywhere from 25 – 33ish.

Observer: Jonathan Flint

Observee: Emma Charleston

Part One

What is the context of this session/artefact within the curriculum?

This is the first session of our new ‘Human Centred Design’ unit, which will run from now until the end of the academic year. This is their second unit (of two) in the first year of the User Experience Design BA course. They will receive a brief after easter, the sessions until then are designed to consist of quickfire exercises introducing various human centred design concepts and methodologies.

How long have you been working with this group and in what capacity

I have been working with this group since September 2023, as ‘Year 1 Lead’ (i.e. their main point of contact for year 1)

What are the intended or expected learning outcomes?

To develop their understanding of human centred design methodologies and concepts in readiness to apply to a brief they’ll receive after easter. In this session specifically, to introduce the concept generally.

What are the anticipated outputs (anything students will make/do)?

During this session, students will (hopefully) show some homework examples, as well as show the results of some exercises we run during the session

Are there potential difficulties or specific areas of concern?

This is our first session back after a 3 week break! So they may be a little discombobulated (as might I!) Some of the students have low language levels and at times struggle during sessions, which I try to mitigate with clear communication, but it can sometimes be hard to communicate tasks and concepts.

How will students be informed of the observation/review?

I will mention it to them in an email before they return for our first session.

What would you particularly like feedback on?

Any thoughts on maintaining students focus, and catering for students with lower language levels very welcome. These is also a totally new session I have not delivered before, so any thoughts on the exercises are very welcome!

How will feedback be exchanged?

Informally verbally after the session, as well as written for the purposes of the PGCert.

Part Two

Observer to note down observations, suggestions and questions:

Engagement, Communication, and Focus

Great level of motivation and enthusiasm from you, your body language is dynamic, and you explain things with gestures as well as walking around the room to the different groups to engage with them. It is good that you also ask a lot of questions and reiterate some of the thing’s students explained so that everyone in the room can hear. You made an excellent effort to make everyone feel welcomed and involved, even the student who was new to the course and taking the unit. You respond well and are intuitive such as the example of the sketching and how you mentioned this was a great activity to practise and develop. 

Be careful as sometimes you speak too quickly, which is understandable as we often try to fit a lot of content into such tight sessions. Remember to slow down a bit and pause to allow for the students to digest and take in the information. I noticed a few students using live translation apps on their phones, this might benefit them. In the show and tell activity some of the responses felt more one to one, but you did try to respond and engage with everyone by asking if they had been to a place or done that activity before. 

Don’t forget to reflect and engage on the student experience, draw parallels to your own experience as a student and learner, what motivated you? what challenges did you face? On some occasions it might be useful to talk to the class on their level, so they feel part of the program and will be more motivated to take part.  A lot of your students have been proactive and done a lot of great things such as internships and are starting their journeys as practitioners and it is great that you are highlighting this but continue to do so.

The part of the session I observed was well structured and delivering your sessions jointly with a colleague was a great way to offer a sense of variety for the students to help keep them engaged. Also, the exchange worked well and was natural which helped give the students a sense of being part of it as well. It will be good to see how you structure and develop your joint sessions in the future. 

Teaching aids/ Room layout

The choice of teaching aids you used to deliver your session worked well. Padlet worked for the show and tell activity you gave; everyone could quickly access it and I noticed a lot of students with it up on their screens. 

Your slides were put together well, and you have important parts that are highlighted and stand out. Be careful as some of the slides were a text heavy (a lot were referring to text readings of course) but more images, visual aids or diagrams could work here. Such as in the examples of bad services having some pictures of the recycling bin or apple mouse could quickly help students navigate what you were explaining more easily. But overall lots of good diverse examples were chosen, again do choose things they will be able to relate to more easily. 

The studio space is clean and bright it has the essence of a studio workplace which helps a lot if you want students to attend (our studio is very dark and not very welcoming!). The layout is a bit narrow though and because of this and the placement of the screens, you do tend to face away from the class when changing slides, positioning yourself on the side of the lectern might help here so that you are facing everyone. Also, you naturally tend to look at the screen to the left of the room and at the middle of the room, try to look at the back of the room as well to keep the students there included and try to walk over there a bit more as well.

The Exercise and Activities 

For the show and tell a lot of students uploaded content which was positive to see, and it was a great peer exchange activity so that they could see each other’s interests and influences. Because of the nature of Padlet you were scrolling through each of the pieces of content so didn’t realise how much had been uploaded, this part did go on a bit longer than I think you expected at about 30 mins. What might be helpful could be to stretch the peer learning exchange a bit more and allow for groups to present to each other and choosing say three or four people from each group to present to the class, you could even make it a bit more engaging by pinning things to the wall in an exhibition type context to get the students walking around the space and leaving it there for the day so they can read and look at things later. 

Other Notes: 

Overall, you show a good level of enthusiasm and planning and have a variety of activities for students to take part in. It was great to see you recapping and reminding students what happened in previous sessions, and I like that in the beginning you present events around London they can visit, this is a great way to build up community and the culture of your program.

Part Three

Observee to reflect on the observer’s comments and describe how they will act on the feedback exchanged:

I found the experience of having Jon come to this session and observe really rewarding, and extremely useful to reflect on which elements of my teaching which are within my control, and which are not. (The answer is invariably that you can change more than you think!)

Jon offered some valuable thoughts on the layout of the room I teach in, which is sub-optimal. I have been well aware of this for the entire time I have delivered sessions there — it is a narrow rectangular room with not quite enough room for the number of students it needs to contain, and awkward bays of computers and equipment which limit the use of some edges of the room. Jon was encouraging about how I move around the room in a proactive way (attempting to engage all students no matter where they are sat), but he did note that the placement of the screens means I have to turn away from students when changing slides, or when more directly gesturing at slides.

I am not sure I have much power to change the placement of the screens, but I may be able to position my laptop with slides on in such a way that I can remain facing the room, rather than having to turn. As a team we do also continue to tinker with the layout of tables in the room to try and reach a more optimal layout.

As this was the first hour of the first session of a new unit, there was much more of my voice than I would have liked. I prefer to centre my sessions around activities, and can see how much more engaged students are when this is the case, but very occasionally it’s hard to avoid more prolonged sections of exposition, as in this observed session. The show and tell activity at the start of the session ran on unexpectedly long, and, in part because I was being observed, I was reluctant to pivot format midway through. Being flexible during sessions when activities aren’t running according to timings or to plan is something I usually pride myself on, and Jon’s comments further highlighted this need to be flexible.

Perhaps the most useful piece of feedback for me was Jon’s comment that my slides could have had more imagery. In the previous unit (Visual Communication), my slides did contain plenty of imagery, but in this more theoretical, methodology based unit, I had strayed too far into text only slides. It was a good reminder to me that all sorts of different aspects of a slide can be illustrated with an image and it can offer a valuable ‘way in’ for all students, particularly those with lower language levels. I will aim to be more proactive in adding more images to my slides going forwards!

It was great to hear Jon’s positive feedback on the good energy between me and my teaching partner Patrick. Sharing delivery in this way has been a positive thing for me and Patrick, and as Patrick has recently gained more hours, we will be even more empowered to split the delivery of sessions more evenly between us, which brings a greater energy to the room and helps keep students engaged. I know that I can be quite a dominant voice, so it is important that I allow space for Patrick to contribute to my sections, as he so generously allows me to do during his.

Posted in Observations, TPP Submission | Leave a comment

Microteaching Account

In my micro teaching session I tried something new, testing a session around collaboration and teamwork incorporating elements we introduce to students during the first term of the MA Biodesign course around field observation.

The session focused on the fictional scenario of an ‘unidentified specimen’ the team had to work together to identify. 

The plan:

-Introduction 2 mins

-The Scenario, object, and demo of the tool 5 mins

-Activity 8 mins

-The presentation and Reveal 5 mins

On the day I was the first to deliver my session, it was with a group of two at first then three. I began with an introduction to myself and the Biodesign program giving examples of past student projects, this went over by a minute. 

Next I set the scenario of the ‘unidentified specimen’. I showed the group the mini microscope tool, did a quick demo and handed out the ‘unidentified specimen ID’ form. The activity was to work as a team to find out what they could about the specimen and present this.

I planned to ask more prompts inspired by Judy Willcocks emotional object reading resources (Central Saint Martins Museum & Study Collection, 2021), but I didn’t get a chance to ask many, as the group was engrossed in the activity thinking out loud and asked me questions. I encouraged the group to fill out the questions in the form, which they quickly completed.

The team presented what they found out and I revealed the specimen, which was a fabric sample, which generated further discussion. 

The decisions I took were influenced by the tips on OBL in practice by Kirsten Hardie how an OBL activity can develop collaboration amongst new classmates (Hardie, 2015). And the workshop formats Judy Willcock’s uses to get students to deeply examine objects through three stages of describing, deducing and storytelling (Central Saint Martins, 2018). Lastly the session referenced prior work from my professional practise around narrative building and design artefacts that take familiar forms such as newspapers and in this case a laboratory specimen form (Jankauskas & Flint, 2018).

The ID Form

Overall I think my peers understood and were engaged in the session. A takeaway was to rearrange the form so the ‘Observer’s Background Data and statement’ was at the top as the aim was collaboration. Iterating on the aim of the session will be useful here when designing future content. They found the pacing and guidance was enough, going forward I do tend to over guide and not allow enough time for exploration so allowing some pauses and space for exploration in future sessions will be useful. The tutor present commented that the engaging nature of the session helped set the tone for collaboration throughout the day. Perhaps similar sessions can lead to important bonding moments with peers or could serve as moments to encourage debate and discussion around different subject matters.

I enjoyed the diversity of approaches and disciplines explored in the other sessions throughout the day. Some more informative with a clear goal in mind and some more reflective and contemplative, it shows there is no set approach or method to teaching. A lot of my peers tied their own practise and research interests into their sessions which I sometimes forget to do. 

References :

Central Saint Martins (2018) Museum & Study Collection: Judy Willcocks Copenhagen Presentation. 27 June. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M3O7MM5WuFo (Accessed: 6 March 2024).

Central Saint Martins Museum & Study Collection (2021) Emotional responses to objects. 22 September. Available at: https://ual.cloud.panopto.eu/Panopto/Pages/Viewer.aspx?id=584e5aa6-e2a7-4d77-a92a-ac5c00bcd35a&start=0 (Accessed: 6 March 2024).

Hardie, K. (2015) Wow: The power of objects in object-based learning and teaching. Higher Education Academy. Available at: https://www.advance-he.ac.uk/knowledge-hub/wow-power-objects-object-based-learning-and-teaching (Accessed: 6 March 2024).

Jankauskas, V. and Flint, J. (2018) Moonshot Café. Available at: https://vjfstudio.com/works/13/moonshot-cafe (Accessed: 7 March 2024). 

Posted in Microteaching Session, TPP Submission | Leave a comment

Record of Observation or Review of Teaching Practice 1 Peer Observation

Emma observing Jon (6/2/24)

Session/artefact to be observed/reviewed: Tutorial Session

Size of student group: 20 students (2 in this observation session)

Observer: Emma Charleston

Observee: Jonathan Flint

Observee to complete in brief and send to observer prior to the observation or review:

What is the context of this session/artefact within the curriculum?

This will be a one-to-one Tutorial Session for Unit 3 of the MA Biodesign course (2-year program) this is with year 2 students.

How long have you been working with this group and in what capacity

I have been working with this cohort since I joined the program in September 2022 (they were year 1 when I joined). I work 2.5 days in my role and I am the main tutor for the year 2 students.

What are the intended or expected learning outcomes?

These focus on design development and project contextualization for unit 3.

What are the anticipated outputs (anything students will make/do)?

Students will present their final project progress and discuss their plan for the upcoming joint review event taking place on February 21st, 2024.

Are there potential difficulties or specific areas of concern?

To check how much progress the students have been making. Sometimes not much progress is made.

How will students be informed of the observation/review?

I have emailed the 2 students in advance, and they have confirmed with me that the observation is fine.

What would you particularly like feedback on?

General feedback, no one has ever observed me giving tutorials, so anything you notice about the session will be helpful such as:

What can I do better? How to build engagement if students haven’t done anything or made much progress? How can I help when the students have a future tutorial? How to keep notes etc?

How will feedback be exchanged?

Verbally and written if possible.

Part Two

Observer to note down observations, suggestions and questions:

Positioning

Sitting side by side is good — it means you can turn and do direct eye contact where needed but also it’s lower pressure — more like you’re looking at a thing (the student’s work/a shared resource) together, rather than having to look directly at each other the whole time (feels less like an interview).

Students work/critique

As I’ve learnt, it’s very important that the students actually bring their work to tutorials. Are they just better students than mine? (Highly possible, they are MA students!)

With my undergrads I often feel like they don’t want to share their work because they are scared of constructive feedback (I hope this is a first year undergrad thing, not a me thing!) “I’ve done my thing and I like it, I don’t want to have to change it!” — but with these more mature students they are clearly ready for conversation and they understand what this process is about, which is pushing forward their work together with your help. They see and respect the value in your feedback, and you offer a really in depth conversation in a way which shows it’s really clear you really know and understand the individual students and their projects. 

Pastoral

I did note there was no pastoral element to these tutorials — but I am lacking in context here (for example, you may have spoken to them all pastorally very recently!) I like to always start by asking students how they are doing, and try and make clear that I am really asking, not just as a courtesy. This opens up the possibility for them to raise any issues that might be affecting their work, and by doing this in every tutorial with every student, they come to expect it, and it never seems like you are singling someone out as ‘a concern’. I never force the point, but try and make sure there is space for it. But you will know best whether this is appropriate for you!

Noise issues

You undertook tutorials in a room with lots of other people/some noise. You may not have had a choice in this! I personally always prefer to conduct scheduled tutorials in a separate space, due to the challenges of noise pollution (especially when communicating with non first language English students). It also means that, if there are any pastoral issues, the student has a safer space in which to raise them. It can also be also easier to address any students who are having real challenges with their work if there aren’t other students present.

Could you have sat further down the room/angled yourself so noise pollution would be less of an issue? Again maybe a me thing, realising how much I personally am affected by this. For example, I could more easily hear the more loudly spoken student and tutor on the other side of the room than I could you and your student.

That said, I love the feeling of studio culture, with other people working in the space, it does give a good energy in some ways.

Sharing notes with fellow tutors

What is your process for communicating what you learn in these tutorials with other tutors? Is that relevant here? Do other tutors need to know what you have discussed / do you document these tutorials in any way? I saw you taking some handwritten notes, what happens to these?

We did briefly chat about this afterwards and it sounds like you have a conversation with your co-tutor afterwards to discuss each student’s progress. This works well currently with your small cohort but it did seem like with your larger group next year there may be value in some shortform notes on each student that you and your fellow tutors can refer back to later.

Sharing external references

It was good that you had a pen and paper at the ready to sketch things out for students (I always make the mistake of not having these to hand and having to run off to get some when I inevitably want to draw something!)

It’s also great that you refer to external sources in your tutorials — like showing a book, and something you looked up on your laptop screen. Being able to offer students external inspiration ad hoc is really valuable. 

Overall, you’re really good at listening to the students. You strike a good balance between advice and letting them develop their own ideas. You offered a good summaries at the end, and a warm, friendly conclusion, which should leave your students feeling buoyed and inspired to continue their work. 

You give a very generous energy — nothing feels rushed, everything feels thoughtful, you feel genuinely engaged with, and interested in, your students work.

Part Three (Completed by Jon)

Observee to reflect on the observer’s comments and describe how they will act on the feedback exchanged:

Positioning: Emma made a good observation around the way that I sit with students through one-to-one tutorials. I hadn’t noticed I was doing this and naturally just sit side by side with a student. I will notice my positioning more and adapt according to different situations, it is important to make people feel more at ease. 

Students work/critique: Emma had reflected on the fact that it was great to see my students bringing work with them to tutorials, whilst some of her students don’t always bring their work due to fear of them not wanting to change anything.

I have gotten to know the students over the course of the 2 years, but this is not always the case when it comes to bigger and bigger cohorts. I do remind the students a week in advance to bring their work with them, and in the past have tied this into a deliverable task, which had varying degrees of success (some uploaded and bought the task to the tutorial, and many didn’t). The two students who you observed happened to bring their work, but this is not always the case some have work that is growing in the lab (though in some tutorials I have jointly given with my course leader this is not an excuse and they should still bring their experiments and lab work to the studio). 

Unit 3 is always a difficult one as everyone is at different stages in their process. I relate to how your undergraduate students feel like they don’t want to share anything to avoid feedback and find it very difficult to give feedback when someone hasn’t bought anything to discuss. Perhaps there could be an alternative activity or plan making session I could introduce in a context where someone hasn’t got anything to show perhaps linked to pastoral care. I also want to try to encourage more students to bring things in no matter how refined they are and create a safe space in which they will want to share. Yes, some will be stubborn and not want to change things too much, but perhaps this is where peer learning exchanges and group tutorials might be useful. I try to encourage peer exchanges to happen as much as I can by signing up our course to take part in group events at CSM (such as the recent joint work in progress we put on this week in collaboration with 4 other courses).

Pastoral: In terms of content during the tutorial Emma saw how there was no pastoral element included. In our tutorial provision year 1 has an element of pastoral concerns but year 2 focuses on design development. The students know we have office hours in which to contact us and some have in the past. But I agree I think it will be a good way to start tutorials in the future by just small things even as a sort of ice breaker to relieve the tension a bit and understand their contexts. 

Noise issues: There was a good observation about the studio environment and how it was noisy as we had tutorials running in parallel. This was the first session we had run tutorials in parallel it has normally just been me giving tutorials, so this wasn’t an issue. But this is good to note, I can also ask students if they prefer a quieter space as well, or a change of environment. This could be included on their tutorial sign ups, but giving the students the option could be nice. I did one tutorial last term walking around outside, which was quite engaging and more conversational and sometimes I do some outside the studio near the canteen space or in our office, though this is on the other side of the building.

Sharing notes with fellow tutors: Emma had queried about how I communicate with other tutors around what was discussed.  The notes I write down are for the students I sometimes give them the notes, the notes are also for me to remember what was discussed, I have tried to type these up as I go but find it distracting for me and the student. I share my notes verbally with my co-tutor through a catch up at the end of the day, where we might flag concerns or next steps for the student. But there is no formalised way in which this takes place and will be useful for a larger cohort. Maybe a good way would be to create a template or simple form in which we can fill out and share at the end, or a digital space where we can write notes as an archive of the students’ progress.

Sharing external references: Emma had picked up on how I share sources and explain things during tutorials. I find myself with a thousand tabs opened at the end of the day’s tutorials, I have tried to send students references straightaway, but this again becomes a bit of distraction, but perhaps digital tools like Miro or Padlet could be useful here where I can post links and references so students can refer to them after and not have to crawl through emails to find them. 

The notes and structure of the observation is very helpful and made me more aware of the things I might subconsciously or naturally do, as well as what I feel I am expected to do. There were a lot of useful suggestions mentioned that Emma drew from her teaching experience, going forward I am excited to implement and test out some of the suggestions but also reflect and observe my own teaching practise more critically. 

When, I starting teaching on the Biodesign course at CSM I would create some notes reflecting on the session, this was in more relation to workshops I was giving, asking what worked well? What could be improved? What questions were raised? What seemed confusing? I stopped doing this at some point because of more and more time constraints. I may find a way to revive this mini reflection and implement something new per session to see how it works. 

Posted in Observations, TPP Submission | Leave a comment

Blog 1: Object Based Learning (OBJ) and the Rose Analysis

The online cross program event was delivered by Judy Willcocks & Georgina Orgill covering ‘Object based learning’ this was a coincidence as my reading from the previous workshop was all about OBL and the role it has in uncovering complexities for online learning environments (Willcocks & Mahon, 2023).

In the OBL session I learnt about the CSM museum and study collection and the history of the object based learning approach. In Georgina Orgill’s (2024) session we tried different examples of object based activities using three different sources, one tangible in front of us, and two digital and online. Our group discussed what we found the most effective, I seemed to be drawn to the still image (the digital source), this offered a lot of room for ambiguity and storytelling to form as it didn’t offer a lot of clues around what it was. The aspect of ambiguity reminded me of a lecture around the power of ambiguity in crafting more thought provoking designs (Gaver et al., 2003) I had witnessed whilst studying on my masters program.

I considered how to employ an OBL methodology in an upcoming teaching session I had to give around approaches to prototyping to our year 1 cohort. I thought of showing them two images of different prototypes of different fidelities one being DIY and rough, another more refined and then getting them to explore the aesthetics, materials used and explain what it meant for their practises. I later abandoned this as I thought it might be too confusing.

I did apply what I had learnt from the OBL session in a later session I co-hosted around visual communication using the Gillian Rose analysis, in this session we introduced our students to the analysis with an example and then allowed them some time to swap and analyse their own images with this method, uncovering new ways of viewing them (Central Saint Martins Museum and Study Collection, 2021). Based on what they learnt we introduced an image foraging activity where students pieced together images of their projects and their peers to form new narratives.

I am not sure if this was a useful session for this cohort as I did not receive much feedback around the methods we used. My co-host in the session pointed out that I tended to step in too early with the students and didn’t leave enough time for them to digest and take in the method themselves, this was an important realisation for me in my teaching practise. Going forward I think OBL is a useful interactive tool. I tried it on a visual level but I would like to try it again on a more tangible level when doing workshops around process and prototyping, perhaps this could be an opportunity to get alumni in to show their final work so current students can analyse the materials and wider themes the work uncovers.

References:

Central Saint Martins Museum and Study Collection (2021) ‘Some activities and resources’, Rose visual analysis method. Available at: https://arts.ac.libguides.com/c.php?g=686452 (Accessed: 31 January 2023).

Gaver, W.W., Beaver, J. and Benford, S. (2003) ‘Ambiguity as a resource for design’, Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 233–240. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1145/642611.642653. 

Orgill, G. (2024) How we incorporate Object-Based Learning into the online classroom at the ASCC [Lecture]. University of the Arts London. 24 January.

Willcocks, J. and Mahon, K. (2023) ‘The potential of online object-based learning activities to support the teaching of intersectional environmentalism in art and design higher education’, Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 22(2), pp. 187–207. Available at: https://doi:10.1386/adch_00074_1. 

Posted in TPP Blog Posts, TPP Submission | Leave a comment

Beginnings

Reflection on workshop 1 and 2

Reflecting on the workshop sessions that launched the PGcert, firstly I was fascinated by the range of all the activities used during the session to help with everyones engagement and attention spans. It was so well done that it almost felt we were being taught in stealth. I enjoyed the yarn based icebreaker as well as the timeline activity and various discussions. This is a far cry from sitting there listening to another slide presentation and being talked at for too long, I’ am already inspired by many of the activities and methodologies used in this first session. In the session it was interesting to learn about the context of higher education, especially how the Dearing report in the 1990’s paved the way for the state of higher education as we know it today. The reading I was assigned dealt how online object based learning activities are used to explore complex global and societal issue through the climate emergency lens. The reading drew a lot of parallels with the course I teach on (MA Biodesign) and I was fascinated by the analysis of botanical drawings with the Gillian Rose visual analysis method. I found it useful to discuss our readings with our peers as it helped me to solidify and reflect on what I took from the reading, which can easily be forgotten.

The second part of the workshop got us to example some scenarios, one being that of the charismatic lecturer and learning through observation. For me when I first started teaching my image of a lecturer was someone charismatic that could engage and persuade a room with any ideas, and for many of my peers they also had this image in mind. But teaching can take on many different forms and approaches. We responded to the students’ diverse needs in the last discussion of the workshop, the partner I was paired with had many crossovers even coming from vastly different disciplines from the challenges of growing cohorts to the difficulties of collaboration and group work. This first few session really opened my eyes to a lot of new theories and approaches but also gave me a sense that we are all part of a community and that everyone is in the same boat here, there is a power in the network that the course places you in, I am excited to see what comes next. 

Posted in Uncategorised | Leave a comment

Hello PgCert

Just testing out the blog and ready to post some stuff soon. Here is a drawing made by a peer of mine during the induction session.

Posted in Uncategorised | 1 Comment